View Full Version : The Buck Needs To Stop With Obama
TennesseeTuxedo
March 26th, 2009, 12:37 PM
This is not an inherited mess, but rather one created by Obama.
Obama's stimulus plan and proposed budget will balloon to unprecedented debt in this country and the loss of private sector jobs, as they raise taxes on entrepreneurs in the private sector.
Bush and Republicans are not innocent by any means as they had poor spending habit. Notice the huge difference in government spending under Bush and compare it to that of Obama. Also note the fact that the Democrats took control of Congress in the 2006 elections. Since Congress controls the budget, the decline of the economy (which started around 2007) can be traced to policies from a Democratic Congress.
There has never been a nation on this planet that taxed itself into prosperity.
http://media3.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/graphic/2009/03/21/GR2009032100104.gif
Obama's Plan Is To Borrow Almost $10 Trillion (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/graphic/2009/03/21/GR2009032100104.html)
Before Poley tries to pass this off as the fault of GW Bush, remember that the $787 Billion Stimulus Pakage was all Obama's idea and passed with no Republican votes in the House of Representatives and only 3 votes in the Senate- thus this package is a Democrat dominated and inspired failure that will be blood on their hands.
Remember also that the $410 billion added to the budget last month passed the House with only a total of 16 out of 245 Republican votes and a total of 8 Republican votes in the Senate.
President Bush left the second half of TARP funding, $350B, to President-elect Obama last year, who promptly asked for it and got it.
Polemicvol
March 27th, 2009, 11:06 PM
In your chart, doesn't include the hundreds of billions of dollars he spent each and every year in fighting his "war on terra". The numbers for Obama do include these formerly "extra budgetary items".
That's because Obama believes in transparancy in government and has stopped the budgetary bullshit Bush did for 8 years. Obama's numbers are real, Bush's numbers were bullshit.
Your charts and your post is also bullshit.
TennesseeTuxedo
March 28th, 2009, 01:33 AM
In 2 months your fascists dictator has spent more money than all of the presidents that came before him put together.
Athenian
March 28th, 2009, 12:49 PM
Poly wants it both ways as do all ultra liberals. He posted a statement attributed to some prof at MIT that disputes all his own claims. And that is that all things bad in this country are on George Bush's hands. His "anti-Christ" has just upped the money and troops for Afganistan. I thought he was pulling all troops back home. Transparent my ass. He buries his real agenda in the depths of a foot think stack of papers and then pushes passage when no one in Congress has time to read the batch of bullshit. Not that it would make any difference with the likes of Pelosi and Reed and the republicans for that matter.
The AIG guys are angels compared to what we have in Congress.
"If not FedEx, Memphis would be anothe East St. Louis".
Polemicvol
March 29th, 2009, 01:36 AM
I knew there was a branch of the radcons who believed that Obama is the Anti-Christ, but I had not yet personally met anyone who admitted this belief before now.
It's really hard to converse seriously with someone so extreme as to hold those kind of wacky beliefs.
GhenghisVol
March 29th, 2009, 04:00 AM
I thought Bill Clinton was the Anti Christ, then I became convinced George Bush was the Anti Christ after 9/11, I dont have that same feeling for Obama. I like his leadership, but you cant fix the problem he INHERITED by flooding the market with keystroke dollars.
If they dont unleash the technologies they have kept hidden for the last 30 odd years in the next two, we are going to be in deep deep shit, its the only cure.
LegendofNation
March 29th, 2009, 04:14 AM
If they dont unleash the technologies they have kept hidden for the last 30 odd years in the next two, we are going to be in deep deep shit, its the only cure.[/QUOTE]
Good to see you back on the Morass. But, if youre gonna participate, leave your shit in the toilet.
GhenghisVol
March 29th, 2009, 04:20 AM
Huh? Radical explosive technology is the only thing that will impact the economy in a positive manner at this point. We are in a death spiral, and the administration thinks stimulus packages with NO manufacturing base and NO jobs while they encourage companies like IBM to outsource offshore is going to fix everything. Its a bandaid, and they're just buying time.
When the dollar is no longer the world's currency, and people finally realize the unemployment figure is closer to 20% than it is to 7%, and the private Federal Reserve banks screams "no mas", its going to be hell. We need a radical solution, anybody that doesnt agree with that is an idiot.
LegendofNation
March 29th, 2009, 04:22 AM
Huh? Radical explosive technology is the only thing that will impact the economy in a positive manner at this point. We are in a death spiral, and the administration thinks stimulus packages with NO manufacturing base and NO jobs while they encourage companies like IBM to outsource offshore is going to fix everything. Its a bandaid, and they're just buying time.
When the dollar is no longer the world's currency, and people finally realize the unemployment figure is closer to 20% than it is to 7%, and the private Federal Reserve banks screams "no mas", its going to be hell. We need a radical solution, anybody that doesnt agree with that is an idiot.
Not saying that I dont agree with you, but this miracle technology we need hasnt been around for 30 years.
GhenghisVol
March 29th, 2009, 04:32 AM
Yes it has, and you claim to have witnessed it.
LegendofNation
March 29th, 2009, 04:44 AM
What have I claimed to witness?
Nah, I wont play that game. I know what youre talking about, and I would imagine those technologies are so beyond our level of thinking it will take, oh, about 10,000 years for us to master.
GhenghisVol
March 29th, 2009, 05:02 AM
You can be such a retard sometiimes.
No, 100 years ago we were 10,000 years away, but not now. And I'm not talking about buiilding starships, I'm talking about fielding the technology that drives those fuckers cause its (dare I say it) free, and its basically very simple physics.
The intelligence community is currently at war with itself for ownership of the technology, which currently (and oddly) belongs to the Navy. The Obama administration is as close as we've seen since JFK to listening to the proposition to reveal whats going on, and this happens to be a major factor in why Kennedy was murdered.
I think the technology will be unveiled in the next 4-5 years, but it wont be introduced as or described by anything that associates it with ET. And the numbers are astronomical in its impact. BTW, I dont plan on arguing with you monkeys are debating any of this, it is what it is, and I'm rarely if ever wrong about this shit.
LegendofNation
March 29th, 2009, 10:08 AM
You can be such a retard sometiimes.
No, 100 years ago we were 10,000 years away, but not now. And I'm not talking about buiilding starships, I'm talking about fielding the technology that drives those fuckers cause its (dare I say it) free, and its basically very simple physics.
The intelligence community is currently at war with itself for ownership of the technology, which currently (and oddly) belongs to the Navy. The Obama administration is as close as we've seen since JFK to listening to the proposition to reveal whats going on, and this happens to be a major factor in why Kennedy was murdered.
I think the technology will be unveiled in the next 4-5 years, but it wont be introduced as or described by anything that associates it with ET. And the numbers are astronomical in its impact. BTW, I dont plan on arguing with you monkeys are debating any of this, it is what it is, and I'm rarely if ever wrong about this shit.
That's just too much shit for me to handle.
Why wasnt it any of it in JFK?
GhenghisVol
March 29th, 2009, 04:25 PM
Stone had a script essentiallly about the CIA smokescreen that led Garrison down a dozen blind alleys trying to prove a government conspiracy that couldnt be proved. Not that there wasnt one, there was, but his film was strictly about the investigation, not the multiple reasons why Kennedy was murdered.
And besides that, any mention of UFOs would have had people howling with laughter, it wasnt consistent with the times. Hell some idiots still believe Oswald actually had anything to do with the assassination, how would you get them to buy into this angle?
aadicof
March 29th, 2009, 06:25 PM
I saw a pretty convincing show on the History Channel a couple weeks ago that put it all on Oswald. And if it's on tv, well then, it's good to me. Hell, that's almost as credible as it being on the internet!
:31:
ZippyVol
March 29th, 2009, 06:52 PM
And besides that, any mention of UFOs would have had people howling with laughter, it wasnt consistent with the times. Hell some idiots still believe Oswald actually had anything to do with the assassination, how would you get them to buy into this angle?
Well, I'll say this much. Even though I'm about as far from a conspiracy theorist as anyone you would ever see: I'm convinced there was a gignormous coverup with the JFK assasination. I mean, I know there are government conspriacies. Lots of them, in fact. I just think it's rare to find one that involves more than a handful of people. The more people involved, the less likely it is. JFK's assasination is the holy grail of US Government conspiracies, IMO.
Of course, I dont shed a tear for Oswald. Not because I think he was guilty of what he was accused of...being a lone gunman. I'm certain he was not (I find the idea to be quite silly in fact). But, I also have no doubt he was involved.
Also: I've actually read quite a bit about the JFK assasination and the theories about it over the years (I was quite fascinated by the whole thing when I was younger, in my early 20's). I've read alot of theories & reasons, but I've never read about him being murdered due to keeping some alien technology burried in A51 like from the movie Independence day.
GhenghisVol
March 29th, 2009, 07:19 PM
Like I said, it was one of "multiple" reasons. They just kept stacking up, he wanted to go public with it. Thats also the reason why Adm Forrestal took a dive out of a 16 story window.
EBE
March 29th, 2009, 09:27 PM
We created the hybrid man in a way that we could control the human race.
The yellow book is our instrument of proof to you leaders. We have shown your people visual and audio evidence and their is no denying that we are your creators.
A super secret fund was set up through the military wing of the White House. Millions of dollars were funneled through MJ12 to build secret bases.
There were those who wanted to come forward and make this knowledge known. We could not allow this.
We do not exist.
Can I have some more strawberry ice cream?
TennesseeTuxedo
March 29th, 2009, 11:53 PM
EO 11110 was his undoing.
GhenghisVol
March 30th, 2009, 03:47 AM
Good a reason as any.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.5 Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.